Dad and Daughter in Danger
The toxic trio - 1 abuser, 1 violent thug and 1 lawbreaking solicitor
After 6 years of horror, this case has so much illegality, wrongdoing and abuse: a parent stealing her child's inheritance, a solicitor breaking the law, a violent thug, court judgments showing years of abuse, UK judges ignoring crime, two tier courts, a dad in fear and more.
Clearly dad and daughter are in danger. We won’t let his story die even if he does. For the UK courts to allow an abuser and taxpayer funded lawyer to do all of this when the parties had mediated an agreement in November 2023, shows how dangerous the UK’s family courts are.
The toxic trio plotting harm and destruction:
Natalie Kennedy - court judged her to have made malicious false allegations, attempted fraud, gaslit dad and tried to alienate her child. She abducted her child 3 hours away in the UK. She has historical rage, anger and other mental health issues. She hasn’t called her child for months but has stolen her child’s inheritance. She has petrified and abused dad for 6 years.
Summary: https://friendsoffairparentingpodcast.substack.com/p/summary-4ee
Floros Argyrou - financially motivated and funded by the Legal Aid gravy train he is now charging over £400 per hour to take the child’s inheritance, a house. Dad offered to sign his rights to the house away to save it for the child but mum and solicitor wanted it for themselves. They don’t care they are harming the child. Mother has a prior court judgment of attempted fraud and Floros Argyrou is lining his pockets with the child’s inheritance.
He also broke the law by illegally breaking and entering into the house, harassing and threatening the tenant, illegally evicting the tenant and stealing their belongings. A High Court judge confirmed in writing his order did not permit Floros Argyrou to do what he has. This would not be the first time a solicitor has broken the law for money. It is widespread in other cases. When money is available, some lawyers commit crimes too.
More on Floros - https://friendsoffairparentingpodcast.substack.com/p/bad-actors-floros-argyrou
Miceál O’Hurley - violent thug, ex-Special Forces, has a Canadian assault judgment and fraudulently claimed to be Ukraine’s Honorary Consul in Ireland, causing Ukraine to issue a press statement saying he was not. He threatened dad.
Miceál’s background - https://friendsoffairparentingpodcast.substack.com/p/miceal-ohurley
Miceál’s Canadian Assault Judgment - https://friendsoffairparentingpodcast.substack.com/p/miceal-ohurley-canadian-assault-judgment
There are court judgments, psychologist, psychiatrist and Social Services reports, police reports, newspaper articles (see link on Miceál O’Hurley’s page). Dad wants everything published but Kennedy and co got a gag order because they don’t want anyone to see what they’ve done. We’ll make sure everything is published here. If they get the Substack removed it will appear elsewhere.
Dad fears for his safety. All 3 of these people have broken the law. There are UK court judgment’s against Kennedy, a Canadian judgment against O’Hurley and a UK high Court judge confirmed Argyrou did not have have permission from the court to break into a house or, months later, evict tenant. They will clearly break the law to cause harm.
Many would question how this can go on in the UK, except in the last year the world has scene how things are there: two tier justice, jail for tweets, etc.
Courts let pedophiles off, ignore 250,000 girls being gang-raped with cover-ups from police, councils and higher. Crimes are ignored while people are jailed for Facebook posts. The UK legal system has gone insane in front of the whole world and this case is just one of many.
Here is a picture of O’Hurley and his pals:
You would think the judge would understand dad’s fear of return.
Dad and daughter are in danger. They have had house and passports taken and are sitting ducks for any lunatic sent after them. Dad has told the court many times of his fear of attack but the judge ignores it, knowing full well there is no accountability for her if anything happens.
The summary of chronology and case is here: https://friendsoffairparentingpodcast.substack.com/p/summary-4ee
but even more briefly:
2018-2023: Kennedy abducted the baby at 9 months old and took it 3 hours away, court judged she wanted to alienate the child, attempted fraud, gaslit dad and told false malicious allegations.
She has lied to multiple agencies and gone on to do it worldwide on GoFundMe. Clearly she would lie to the child. She has already upset the child on calls. Court heard the audio and ordered her not to do it.
2023-2025: Dad following a holiday abroad openly says he is too frightened to return to UK, with good reason. Parents mediate a solution with safeguards which makes dad feel safe to return, however Kennedy then walked away from it, and walked away from parenting, preferring to spend the next year getting dad a jail sentence in a high security Category B prison and take her child’s inheritance, should he return. It has left an already frightened man now petrified of the mother and of returning.
The only thing court has ever said dad did wrong was not return to the UK. This was after years of abuse. He begged court to write a protective order to allow him to return and live safely but court refused. That is the only reason he did not return.
Dad was abused for 5 years (judgments show Kennedy abused him), Kennedy has historical mental health issues including rage and anger, and since seeking safety his fear has only increased due to Kennedy’s behaviour. Instead of signing their agreement and parenting she got him a prison sentence, took his and the child’s house, hired O’Hurley, broke the Law with Floros Argyrou and turned her rage on the tenant and dad’s family by stealing their belongings.
Taxpayers are funding this via Legal Aid. There have even been a bunch of ex parte secret hearings and orders. The court will not tell dad what the orders are so he can’t appeal them. For all he knows if he went back to the UK he could be jailed for 10 years. This is not how courts should work. This isn’t even a criminal case, it is civil. It is Kennedy and Argyrou who broke the law by breaking into a house and illegally evicting a tenant.
Kennedy also got the court to freeze bank accounts for 18 months. There could have been a medical emergency with her child or dad and daughter could have been without food or shelter - Kennedy and court didn’t care for her child’s welfare. What they have done is unthinkable in terms of child welfare.
Given for 6 years dad has been citing his fear of Kennedy and asking for protection, and given her rage is off the scale, even harming her child, would you feel safe to go back?
Court has found him in civil contempt for not returning - that is the sole reason for the jail sentence and house taking. Elon Musk recently said nobody should go to jail for civil cases. At the moment the UK has put someone in solitary confinement for civil contempt. The way the UK courts work nowadays dad could become a political prisoner in solitary confinement for 10 years.
Given the risk of harm, alienation, abuse and violence if he went back and total lack of protection from the court - would you feel safe to go back? He feels he has not choice but to try and remain safe, however frightening that is, because going back would be suicide because Kennedy wants him dead - she already has him a jail sentence and homeless.
Not returning is not contempt it is well evidenced understandable fear - after 6 years of this anyone would fear for their safety. The judge ignores this even though they have the previous court judgments of abuse and Kennedy’s medical reports showing why she is to be feared.
You would think a judge would understand why dad is so fearful. Instead the judge called dad a ‘scaredy cat’ for not returning.
In UK courts violent rapists from abroad can avoid deportation by claiming they are afraid or that they will be stressed if deported. Those same UK courts ignore the toxic trio awaiting dad and daughter in the UK. It’s two tier - just as the world has seen in many other cases.
People who have been abused for 6 years, had their passport cancelled, had their house taken, been given a jail sentence, suffered false allegations (proven false in court), been through over 15 High Court hearings on their own, cut off from legal advice by the court but begging the court for a protective order, left their country, house, friends, family, career, etc. - people who have been through all that are not ‘scaredy cats’ they are in fear of someone who is clearly abusive and hellbent on destroying them.
Parenting is way down the list for Kennedy, she hasn’t called her child for months. She has spent the time taking her child’s house and targeting the dad. She will not stop until he is dead.
If you had been through this level of abuse, had court judgments you had been abused, had these 3 lawbreakers after you and you were offered zero protection despite the evidence, would you feel safe go back or try to remain safe?
We will add more to this page and others…stay tuned!